I have been mis

I quote from the General Medical Council Website :

Sharing information with patients

6. Patients have a right to information about the health care services available to them, presented in a way that is easy to follow and use.

7. Patients also have a right to information about any condition or disease from which they are suffering. This should be presented in a manner easy to follow and use, and include information about diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options, outcomes of treatment, common and/or serious side-effects of treatment, likely time-scale of treatments and costs where relevant. You must always give patients basic information about treatment you propose to provide, but you should respect the wishes of any patient who asks you not to give them detailed information. This places a considerable onus upon health professionals. Yet, without such information, patients cannot make proper choices as partners in the health care process. Our booklet Seeking Patients’ Consent:The Ethical Considerations (1998) gives further advice on providing information to patients.

A medical opinion would be used as the document containing the diagnosis needed to arrange my hospitalisation. I would NOT be admitted because "I Was ill" THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE a diagnosis. As with the arrangements for my retirement But then not even the retirement proceedings with the NHS Pensions agency was done properly

BUT Dr A SENT me his Medical Opinion with the attached compliment slip and since that time has refused to answer ANY of my questions.

The NHS Complaint Service allowed him to reply from memory and he wrote in answer to one question, specifically the name of the private psychiatrist in 1998 "I rely on my memory and I do not remember" yet in the Medical Opinion SHE IS NAMED.

This and the compliment slip show that his diagnosis was false. Why else would we need not to contradict each other?

I lost my career and now have a debt for life as I bought the practice for over £110,000 in 1985 and sold it for £28000 in 1998.

I trusted, but was VERY confused by, Dr A's Medical Opinion addressed "To whom it may concern" Also contains some libelous remarks.

Relevant documents.

The Medical Opinion from Dr A, a Compliments Slip, signed by Dr A, that was attached to the Medical Opinion and A letter from the Consultant in Heath House Priory, dated 1999, which shows she did not know I was retired the day I was admitted to her care, in 1998. And a letter from my wife I received at the same time . Just to show the hell I was enduring in the divorce.

home


	I have been mis-diagnosed AND treated as a high risk suicide:
	I quote from the General Medical Council Website : Sharing information with patients 6. Patients have a right to information about the health care services available to them, presented in a way that is easy to follow and use. 7. Patients also have a right to information about any condition or disease from which they are suffering. This should be presented in a manner easy to follow and use, and include information about diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options, outcomes of treatment, common and/or serious side-effects of treatment, likely time-scale of treatments and costs where relevant. You must always give patients basic information about treatment you propose to provide, but you should respect the wishes of any patient who asks you not to give them detailed information. This places a considerable onus upon health professionals. Yet, without such information, patients cannot make proper choices as partners in the health care process. Our booklet Seeking Patients’ Consent:The Ethical Considerations (1998) gives further advice on providing information to patients. A medical opinion would be used as the document containing the diagnosis needed to arrange my hospitalisation. I would NOT be admitted because "I Was ill" THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE a diagnosis. As with the arrangements for my retirement But then not even the retirement proceedings with the NHS Pensions agency was done properly BUT Dr A SENT me his Medical Opinion with the attached compliment slip and since that time has refused to answer ANY of my questions. The NHS Complaint Service allowed him to reply from memory and he wrote in answer to one question, specifically the name of the private psychiatrist in 1998 "I rely on my memory and I do not remember" yet in the Medical Opinion SHE IS NAMED. This and the compliment slip show that his diagnosis was false. Why else would we need not to contradict each other? I lost my career and now have a debt for life as I bought the practice for over £110,000 in 1985 and sold it for £28000 in 1998. I trusted, but was VERY confused by, Dr A's Medical Opinion addressed "To whom it may concern" Also contains some libelous remarks. Relevant documents. The Medical Opinion from Dr A, a Compliments Slip, signed by Dr A, that was attached to the Medical Opinion and A letter from the Consultant in Heath House Priory, dated 1999, which shows she did not know I was retired the day I was admitted to her care, in 1998. And a letter from my wife I received at the same time . Just to show the hell I was enduring in the divorce. home